Linguistic hybridity and multigenerational communication models in Russian Diaspora communities in Shanghai
How to cite
Abstract
This article examines the phenomenon of linguistic hybridity and the features of multigenerational communication models in the communities of the Russian Diaspora in Shanghai. The relevance of the research is due to changes in the globalized world, where diasporic communities face problems of preserving cultural identity and adapting to new living conditions. The research aims to analyze the mechanisms of formation of hybrid language practices that arise under the influence of a multilingual environment, as well as to identify patterns of intergenerational transmission of linguistic norms. The work uses an integrated approach that includes both qualitative and quantitative methods. Ethnographic observations, semi-structured interviews with representatives of various age groups, as well as content analysis in social networks and the media allowed us to collect a representative array of data. The use of comparative analysis provided the identification of key linguistic and socio-cultural characteristics affecting the processes of adaptation and intergenerational interaction in diasporic communities. Russian Russian studies show that the linguistic practice of the Russian Diaspora in Shanghai is characterized by an active mixture of lexical, syntactic, and phonetic elements of Russian, Mandarin, and English. Multigenerational communication is characterized by the presence of specific adaptive strategies, when the older generations preserve traditional linguistic norms, while the younger ones actively integrate new forms reflecting the influence of the environment. The revealed hybrid constructions serve as markers of intercultural dialogue and adaptation, providing a link between the continuity of cultural heritage and innovative forms of self-expression. The discussion focuses on the importance of adaptive language practices for the sustainability of cultural identity in the context of migration and globalization, as well as the potential for using the results obtained in the development of educational and cultural programs aimed at supporting the Russian diaspora in Shanghai. Thus, the article makes a significant contribution to the study of linguistic hybridity and models of intergenerational communication, demonstrating how global processes affect the local linguistic environment.
Keywords
References
Borgoyakova T.G. Ethnic stereotypes in the linguistic consciousness and intercultural communication of Khakass and Russian people // Yearbook of the Institute of Sayan-Altai Turkology. N. F. Katanov Khakass State University. Abakan, 2007, pp. 15-19.
Communicative linguistics and cross-cultural communication // Proceedings of the Inter. scien. and рrac. сonf. 2006. 200 p.
Communicative linguistics and intercultural communication: theses of reports of the Interuniv. scien. сonf. (April 23, 2005, Moscow). Vol. 2. M., 2005. 120 p.
Dialogue of cultures of Pacific Russia and neighboring countries: interethnic, intergroup, and interpersonal communications. Abstracts of the III National Scientific Conference with international participation. 2019. 150 p.
Elkin V.V., Segundo Torres H.M. Linguocommunicative features of interlanguages as hybrid forms of intercultural communication // University Readings-2020: mat. of scien. and meth. readings of PSU. 2020. pp. 78-84. 7 p.
Huseynov G.R., Mugumova A.L. Interlanguage communication, language situation, areal interaction of languages and text in the diachronic aspect (based on the pre-Soviet contacts of the Russian language with the languages of the peoples of the North-Eastern Caucasus) // Language and intercultural communication: mat. of the First Inter. сonf. Ed. By G.V. Ryabichkina. 2007. pp. 68-71.
Katermina V.V. Linguistic models of socio-political communication in the onlinespace: discursive fields, patterns and hybrid methodology of network data analysis. Research and development: grant No. 20-012-00033. Russian Foundation for Basic Research. 2020. 200 p.
Lobovikova E.A. Features of communication in network communities // Youth and Science: reality and the future: mat. of the VIII Inter. scien. and рrac. сonf. 2015. pp. 553-555.
Mass communications: criteria and methods for evaluating effectiveness // Mat. of the Inter. scien. and prac. conf. Irkutsk: Irkutsk State University, 2014. 150 p.
Pocheptsov G.G. Theory of сommunication. M.: Refl-book; Wackler, 2001. 300 p.
Poplavskaya T.V. Once again about the communicative space // Communicative space of Belarus: mat. of the Inter. scien. conf. Minsk: Minsk State Linguistic University, 2017. pp. 3-5. 3 p.
Ryazanov A.V. Ethnos in the communicative space of society. Ed. by V.N. Gasilin. Saratov: Publishing House of Saratov University, 2007. 188 p.
Shindel S.V. The role of dialogical communication in modern polyethnic space // Proceedings of the Intern. scien. full-time and correspond. conf. Saratov, 2010. pp. 289-293.
Tarasova E.I. Intercultural communication on the example of the modern Russian diaspora in Shanghai // Foreign language in professional Communication: cultural studies, psychology, education: mat. of the Interuniv. scien. and prac. conf. 2020. pp. 135-139.
Published
Issue
Section
License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.